Dr. Chuck Tappert Email: email@example.com Website SurveyMonkey
This is the first of a series of five research seminars, see Research Seminars.
Leedy, and Ormrod, Practical Research: Planning and Design (8th Edition), Prentice 2005, ISBN 0131108956.
Strunk and White, The Elements of Style (4th Edition), Longman 2000, ISBN 020530902X.
Bernstein, Schaum's Outline of Elements of Statistics I: Descriptive Statistics & Probability, McGraw 1998, ISBN 0070050236.
Bernstein, Schaum's Outline of Elements of Statistics II: Inferential Statistics, McGraw 1999, ISBN 0071346376.
Other recommended but not required books:
Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods, Sage 2003.
Bolker, Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day, Holt 1998.
Walliman, Your Research Project, Sage 2005.
Booth, Colomb, and Williams, The Craft of Research, Chicago 1995.
Rozakis, Schaum's Quick Guide to Writing Great Research Papers, McGraw 1999.
Rozakis, The Complete Idiot's Guide to Research Methods, Alpha 2004.
Woods, Research Papers for Dummies, Hungry Minds 2002.
Hinton, Statistics Explained, Routledge 2004.
Aczel, Chance: A Guide to Gambling, Love, Stock Market, etc., Thunder's 2004.
Taleb, Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets, Random 2004.
Zobel, Writing for Computer Science, Springer 1997.
Turabian, A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, Chicago 1996.
Bryson, Bryson's Dictionary of Troublesome Words, Broadway Books 2002.
Lessig, The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the COmmons in a Connected World, Vintage 2002.
Stewart, Letters to a young mathematician, Basic Books 2006.
An extensive course website presents all the course information (Blackboard is used only for quizzes). Links in the left menu area are to:
Classroom etiquette: please turn cell phones off during class time.
Individual Assignment 1: Dissertation Evaluation:
Doctoral dissertations by DPS students are research reports. Evaluate a dissertation in accordance with the checklist on pages 9-10 of the Leedy & Ormrod text. PDF versions of the DPS dissertations are available from the DPS internal website, or directly from Online DPS Dissertations. As practice, we will evaluate a paper summarizing a dissertation as an in-class exercise at our first session. This written deliverable is due at our second session.
For this assignment, please choose a dissertation from the following list (those that we are familiar with): Carl Abrams, Bashir Ahmed, Rick Bassett, Larry Bliss, Kathleen Bravo, Rita Hubert, Suman Kalia, Todd Kolb, Pat Lapczynski, Jonathan Law, Kwang Lee, Tom Lombardi, Mary Manfredi, Hany Saleeb, David Ulmer, Mary Villani, and Patrick Wong.
Individual Assignment 2: Literature Review:
Conduct a literature search and draft a review. The search should identify seven to ten pieces, including work that is seminal as well as work that lays the foundation for the ad hoc problem. The review should be composed in accordance with instructions for "Evaluating, Organizing, and Synthesizing the Literature" and the guidelines for "Writing a Clear and Cohesive Review" on pages 77-79 from Leedy & Ormrod. This written deliverable is due at our third session.
Individual Assignment 3: Writing Improvement:
Using simple sentences, avoiding unnecessary verbiage, and using words correctly as well as adhering to the rules of grammar and punctuation as needed for precise expression, correct and clarify a given piece of prose. Use tips from Strunk and White. This written deliverable is due at our fourth session.
Individual Assignment 4: Reverse Engineer an Idea Paper from a Dissertation:
Choose a DPS dissertation from the Assignment 1 list of dissertations. Then, write an idea paper (an idea paper is a brief proposal) on which the dissertation might have been founded. Use the instructions for writing a research proposal given by Leedy & Ormrod in chapter 6, looking closely at the guidelines on pages 121-124 and the "Common Weakness in Research Proposals" identified on pages 126-127. Be certain to explain why the problem is important (Fred's "so what?"). This assignment will be presented and discussed at our fourth session. This written deliverable is due at our final session and must also be posted on the web.
In order to be fair to those students who complete the course in a timely manner, our policy is to reduce the grade of those students taking an incomplete by a letter grade for each semester, or portion thereof, that the incomplete is in effect.
|Quizzes on Readings||100 points|
Reverse Engineer an Idea Paper
from a DPS Dissertation
500 points = 100%
|A 93-100%||465 or more points||Dominates the Material|
|A- 90-93%||450-464 points||Masters the Material|
|B+ 87-90%||435-449 points||Good Understanding
with Flashes of Stellar Work
|B 83-87%||415-434 points||Good Understanding|
|B- 80-83%||400-414 points||Aptitude for the Subject|
|Less than 80%
|below 400 points||Weak for Graduate Work|