During the Cold War, United
States foreign policy efforts centered around stemming the spread of communism
around the world. The United States was
deeply concerned about the spread of communism in South East Asia. During the
1950’s and 1960’s, the Democratic Republic of South Vietnam was at war with the
Communist North Vietnam regime. To
prevent the fall of the South Vietnam, the United States Government initially
contributed resources and a limited number of military advisors to South
Vietnam to stem the tide of Communism, but did not contribute substantial
military forces to defend South Vietnam.
In August 1964, North Vietnamese
gunboats allegedly fired on two United States Naval Destroyers. As a result,
President Lyndon Johnson addressed the United States Congress to pass the Gulf
of Tonkin Resolution. The Gulf of
Tonkin Resolution immediately accelerated United States entry into the Viet Nam
War. In December of 1965, nearly 90,000
US troops were deployed to Vietnam. By 1969, over 500,000 combat troops fought
in Vietnam (supported by the implementation of a national military draft). To
put this in historical context, there are 150,000 troops in Iraq as of January
2004.
Many historians strongly
criticize the exact details of the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. They suggest the Johnson Administration used
the Incident to escalate the War in Vietnam.
Some feel that Lyndon Johnson used the Incident to circumvent the US
Congress’s Constitutional right to declare war.
You will be responsible for
documenting the Gulf of Tonkin incident, its implications on US Policy towards
Vietnam as well. You will also be
responsible for taking a critical look at the “Incident”.
A picture of the Attack of the US Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin, August 2, 1964
Each Student will be
responsible for creating a PowerPoint Presentation (3 to 5 bullet statements
per entry) describing the main points of
a) The Official Description of The Gulf of Tonkin
Incident
b) Alternate Historical Descriptions of the Gulf of
Tonkin Incident
c) President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s Gulf Of Tonkin
Speech To Congress
d) The Implications of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
enacted by Congress
e) Senator Wayne Morse’s (D-Oregon) opposition to the
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
In addition, the student
must create a summary slide describing their individual reactions and
reflections regarding the Gulf of Tonkin incident and its historical
implications. The student will not only read
the previous documents and analysis, but will quickly refer to the US Constitution
which grants Congress the sole right to declare war.
You
will use several Internet Resources to perform your research and create your
presentation including:
a) A Web Site providing information regarding the Gulf
of Tonkin Incident using the following link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Resolution
b) A word-for-word transcript of President Lyndon Baines
Johnson’s speech to Congress regarding the incident. The Transcript can be
located at http://www.luminet.net/~tgort/johnson.htm
A portrait of
President Lyndon
Baines Johnson
c) A transcript of Congress’s Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
(H.J. RES 1145). Transcript is
available at http://www.luminet.net/~tgort/tonkin.htm
d) Criticisms of the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and Resolution. Several web links take a rather critical (and negative) look at the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. These links include
Two
modern criticisms of the incident http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0805-09.htm
and http://www.fair.org/media-beat/940727.html
A
comprehensive military criticism of the incident from the US Naval Institute :
located at http://www.usni.org/navalhistory/Articles99/NHandrade.htm
A
summary of Senator Wayne Morse’s arguments for opposing the Gulf of Tonkin
Resolution located at http://www.fair.org/media-beat/990916.html.
Optionally,
you may wish to listen to a Real Audio stream including an interview with
Senator Morse at the “Radioproject”.
This interview is located at http://www.radioproject.org/archive/1999/9941.html. You only need to listen to the first 13
minutes of the interview which includes commentary of modern historians along
with archival sound interviews of Senator Morse.
e) The United States Constitution's right to declare war (Article 1, Section 8). Follow this link to see the specific Constitutional article regarding congresses prerogative to declare war: http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html#section8
|
|
|
CATEGORY |
|
Good |
Satisfactory |
Unsatisfactory |
1.
Spelling and Grammar |
Presentation
has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has some grammatical errors but no misspellings. |
Presentation
has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors. |
2.
Content - Accuracy |
All
content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors.
Content accurately references source documents and web sites referring to the
Gulf of Tonkin. |
Most of
the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be
inaccurate. In most case, the content accurately reflects the source documents
and web site |
The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. In
some case, the content inaccurately reflects the source documents
and web site |
Content is
typically confusing or contains more than one factual error. Student
makes no effort to reflect the source documents and web sites related to the
Gulf of Tonkin in their presentation. |
3. Originality and Presentation |
Presentation
shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are
presented in a unique and interesting way. |
Presentation
shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented
in an interesting way. |
Presentation
shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards. |
The
project shows minimal effort in terms of presentation originality. |
4.
Sequencing of Information |
Information
is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of
material that might be on the next card. |
Most
information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of
information seems out of place. |
Some
information is logically sequenced. An occasional card or item of
information seems out of place. |
There is
no clear plan for the organization of information. |
5. Effectiveness |
Presentation
comprehensively describes the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and Resolution as well
as critical views of the incident. |
Presentation
describes most of the elements related to the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and
Resolution as well as critical views of the incident. |
Presentation
provides a limited summary of statements related to the Gulf of Tonkin
Incident and Resolution as well as critical views of the incident. |
Presentation
does not include any substance related to the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, the
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. Presentation doesn't summarize critical view of the Vietnam
Incident |
6.
Summary Slide – Personal Reflections
and Reactions |
The Summary Slide identifies and thoughtfully explains and critiques many ideas from the research links related to the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Student brings up a cogent analysis contrasting the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution versus the Constitutional right for Congress to be the sole body to declare war. |
The
Summary Slide and explains several ideas from the research links and
discussions in relation to the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Student describes
the contrast between the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution versus
the Constitutional right for Congress to be the sole body to declare war. |
The
Summary Slide identifies ideas from the research links but does not include
any student reactions in relation to the Gulf of Tonkin question. Student
brings up the
Constitutional right for Congress to be the sole body to declare war but does
not clearly contrast it to the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution . |
The
Summary Slide includes no ideas from the research links and does not include
any student reactions in relation to the Gulf of Tonkin question.
Student provides no historical contrast between the Gulf of Tonkin resolution
and the Constitutional right of Congress to declare war. |
The Constitution grants
Congress the right to declare war (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11-15). Think about the implications of the Gulf of
Tonkin Resolution where Congress gave that authority to declare war to
the Executive Branch (The Johnson Administration). In your summary slide, think
of the implications of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. Do you feel the the
Johnson Administration embellished the incident. Or did the Administration
act responsibly in trying to prevent the spread of communism? Did the Johnson
Administration usurp the constitutional rights given to Congress to declare war
in order to escalate the Vietnam War?. Or did the administration have no other
course of action in order to stem the "communist tide" in Southeast
Asia?